PROSECUTOR v SAM HINGA NORMAN & ORS - DECISION ON MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF EXCULPATORY WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS SUMMARIES AND MATERIALS PURSUANT TO RULE 68 (SCSL-04-14-T ) [2004] SCSL 144 (08 July 2004);


SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE
JOMO KENYATTA ROAD • FREETOWN • SIERRA LEONE
PHONE: +1 212 963 9915 Extension: 178 7000 or +39 0831 257000 or +232 22 295995
FAX: Extension: 178 7001 or +39 0831 257001 Extension: 174 6996 or +232 22 295996


THE TRIAL CHAMBER


Before:
Hon. Judge Benjamin Mutanga Itoe, Presiding Judge
Hon. Judge Bankole Thompson
Hon. Judge Pierre Boutet
Registrar:
Robin Vincent
Date:

9 July 2004
PROSECUTOR
Against
Issa Hassan Sesay
Morris Kallon
Augustine Gbao
(Case No.SCSL--2004-15-T)

GBAO – RULING ON ORAL APPLICATION FOR RESPECT OF DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS


Office of the Prosecutor:

Defence Counsel for Issa Hassan Sesay:
Luc Coté
Lesley Taylor

Tim Clayson
Wayne Jordash

Defence Counsel for Morris Kallon:


Shekou Touray
Wanda Akin


Defence Counsel for Augustine Gbao:
Girish Thanki
Andreas O’Shea

THE TRIAL CHAMBER (“Chamber”) of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (“Special Court”) composed of Hon. Judge Benjamin Mutanga Itoe, Presiding Judge, Hon. Judge Bankole Thompson and Hon. Judge Pierre Boutet;
SEIZED of an application made by Learned Counsel for the 3rd Acccused, Augustine Gbao (“3rd Accused”), made orally on the 7th of July 2004;


NOW RENDERS THE FOLLOWING RULING:


  1. At the hearing of the 7th of July, 2004, Learned Counsel for the 3rd Accused, Mr. Andrea O’Shea, applied to this Court to order the Prosecution to respect its disclosure obligations pursuant to Rule 66 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules”).
  2. This application was made principally in respect of Witness TF1/151 whose evidence, Learned Counsel contends, is very material and runs through about 764 pages of statements, and subsidiarily, in respect of Witnesses TF1/074, TF1/060, TF1/217, TF1/077, TF1/199, and TF1/253.
  3. It is made on the basis of the fact that these witnesses are listed to testify and that their full statements were supposed to have been disclosed to the Defence by the Prosecution at least 42 days before they appear to testify.
  4. Given the fact that these witnesses have not yet been called upon to testify and that all of them might not even testify during the current session, the Chamber is of the opinion that the application by Learned Counsel for the Defence, is premature. However, this issue could be raised and entertained at an appropriate time.
  5. In so holding, the Chamber, in the meantime, calls on both the Prosecution and the Defence to continue to live up to, and to respect their obligations under Rules 66 and 68 of the Rules and other Statutory and Regulatory instruments that govern the due process in the Special Court.
Done at Freetown this 9th day of July 2004

Judge Pierre Boutet

Judge Benjamin Mutanga Itoe

Judge Bankole Thompson

Presiding Judge,
Trial Chamber


[Seal of the Special Court]